I know people who keep meaning to start buying shares, but fail to do so year after year. Often, they are waiting to have a bigger sum of money before they start investing.
If I was investing for the first time, though, in many ways I would rather start with £300 than £3,000. Here’s why.
Cheaper lessons
Many people think they could handily beat the stock market. It is easy to find a pub bore who claims that at some point in the early days of Amazon or Tesla, he had a good feeling about buying their shares.
But such stories often have what behavioural psychologists call a survivorship bias. People may remember companies they spotted early on that later performed well. But they may well forget the dogs they also liked that later sank without trace.
It is also easy to underestimate the psychology of investing if one does not actually have skin in the game. Armchair pundits may focus on their potential return had they bought into a certain share at its year low. But it is another thing in reality to look at a stock that has recently hit the lowest point in 52 weeks, like Scottish Mortgage did in the past week, and part with one’s hard-earned cash to buy into it.
In other words, like many things, investing is something one learns partly by doing. But to start investing, — or anything else — often involves a learning curve.
Nobody sets out to lose money buying a stock. But it is part of investing – and starting with less at stake can mean that valuable investing lessons come at a cheaper price.
Forced to choose
One of the risk management principles I always use is diversification. I think £300 would still be enough to let me do this. I could buy into two or three different shares.
But typically, each trade brings costs such as share-dealing fees. So, if I spread my £300 too thinly, costs would eat up a disproportionate amount of my funds.
Given that, why would I rather start investing with £300 than a larger sum? If I could immediately diversify between 10 or 20 shares, I fear that I might have less incentive to focus on finding brilliant ones. I would potentially simply hope that I had a few strong performers in my broad selection.
By contrast, if I could only invest £150 in each of two shares, I would be more likely only to buy when I felt I was getting a great bargain. A lack of firepower could work in my favour as I would choose my targets with real care and discipline.
Famous investor Warren Buffett thinks most small investors would achieve better results if they took a disciplined approach based on having a finite (and small) number of investment moves they could make in their lifetime.
If I was to start investing with just £300, I would be able to apply this Buffett approach from day one.
The post I’d rather start investing with £300 than £3,000! appeared first on The Motley Fool UK.
Don’t miss this top growth pick for the ‘cost of living crisis’
While the media raves about Google and Amazon, this lesser-known stock has quietly grown 880% – with a:
Greater than 20X increase in margins
Nearly 60% compounded revenue growth over 5 years – more than Apple, Amazon and Google!
A 3,000% earnings explosion
Of course, past performance is no guarantee of future results. However, we think it’s stronger now than ever before. Amazingly, you may never have heard of this company.
Yet there’s a 1-in-3 chance you’ve used one of its 250 brands. Many are household names with millions of monthly website visitors, and that often help consumers compare items, shop around and save.
Now, as the ‘cost of living crisis’ bites, we believe its influence could soar. And that might bring imminent new gains to investors who’re in position today. So please, don’t leave without your FREE report, ‘One Top Growth Stock from The Motley Fool’.
Claim your FREE copy now
setButtonColorDefaults(“#5FA85D”, ‘background’, ‘#5FA85D’);
setButtonColorDefaults(“#43A24A”, ‘border-color’, ‘#43A24A’);
setButtonColorDefaults(“#FFFFFF”, ‘color’, ‘#FFFFFF’);
})()
More reading
Will going nuclear send Rolls-Royce shares into meltdown?
2 dividend stocks I’ve bought for massive passive income!
Hargreaves Lansdown: a passive income stock for even higher interest rates!
How to invest in ‘cheap’ Japanese stocks like Warren Buffett!
Investing in Shell shares: looking beyond the near term!
John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. C Ruane has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Amazon.com and Tesla. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.